Structured, impartial checks on schedules for superstructure and infrastructure projects.
Quietly reducing reporting risk in complex construction projects.
Method, logic, calendars, constraints, coding and deliverability.
Independent review of whether a contractor programme is
physically and temporally feasible.
Early identification of optimism risk between planned
progress and reported cashflow.
Flags on logic gaps, excessive float, constraints and fragility.
Reasonableness of logic changes and effect on key dates.
Update quality, critical path movement and forecast realism.
Targeted review of contractor updates before acceptance or
internal reporting.
Evidence against governance criteria and readiness to proceed.
Concise, management-focused identification of key
schedule-driven risk exposures.
Off-the-record support where something feels “off”
but escalation is premature.
• Independent check before contract award or stage gate.
• Periodic health‑check during delivery.
• Before committing cashflow or progress figures to management
• Focused review after slippage or significant change.
• Before issues escalate into formal disputes
Work is delivered under NDA on request. Reviews are intended for PMO, Project Directors and senior management to support decision‑making.
Outputs are technical and neutral. Services are intentionally designed as indicative, non-contractual diagnostic support.
They provide early risk awareness, not programme ownership, claims preparation or formal determinations.
Engagements are confidential by default and focused on internal decision support.
If a short independent check would reduce reporting risk,
a brief, informal conversation is usually the best starting point.
Disclaimer: All services are provided for internal decision support only and do not constitute contractual, legal or claims advice. Management retains full responsibility for all decisions.